xio
Junior Member
Posts: 97
|
Post by xio on Apr 20, 2019 15:06:46 GMT
Steve Bannon just bought a monastery with some other financiers. They want to build an academy to train populist leaders based on the 'Judeo-Christian tradition.' www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/steve-bannons-roman-holidayMy question is what the spiritual activity will look like in Bannon's monastery? Will they have a "Judeo-Christian" observance of the Holy Hours? If they chant the psalms, this would qualify as Judeo-Christian. Will they pray in the name of the Holy Trinity, Jesus Christ, or just Heavenly Father? This is only the beginning of this activity. Mystery cults and Initiatic organizations are going to become more common. The religious order that I envision won't be able to begin within a centralized space, like an old monastery. It will be online. Religious orders observe the Liturgy of the hours. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liturgy_of_the_Hours. In a contemplative monastery this might be 7 times a day. Monks meet in a chapel and chant, pray, and hear scripture. Active orders like the Franciscans will generally meet twice a day; for morning and evening prayer. Parish Priests must observe morning and evening prayer on their own, thus requiring more discipline. In the Christian orders, each time of the day has symbolic meaning, related to the soul and/or intertwined with the story of Christ. The Order of White Order that I envision would have cyclical devotional periods as well. These would be daily and seasonal. In fact, just as the buds of spring are now just sprouting, we're now seeing simple seasonal devotionals online in the name of White Well Being. www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO74qO747SoThis Spring Incantation is read by Jared George and Jason Kohne. Both of these gentleman have and continue to contribute to White Spirituality. Kohne literally wrote a creation myth for 'Western Kind' within his larger work titled "Born Guilty." nowhiteguilt.storenvy.com/collections/1779402-booksJared George's writing on balance is worth a read. thegreatorder.com/foundational-principles/Any kind of daily devotionals at this point would be on line. Whether or not they were all public or not would be up for discussion; but something public must be available for major seasonal points or "Holy Days." One of the first duties priests have is to watch the calendar and perform the rites that correspond. A calendar (a schedule) is fundamental for bringing the individual and collective out of chaos. If Kronos/Saturn is eternal time, chaos, death, and decay, one of the ways to stand up to him is by creating a system of tracking time to organize around. A calendar is one of the tools Zeus provided us to deal with Kronos/Saturn. Scheduled time is arbitrary but if you're going to make a schedule, you might as well base it on those large bodies floating around in the way far away, that rotate so consistently and harmoniously. And with mention of Zeus or Jupiter, there's guy named Mark Brahmin who has been writing and speaking about spiritual matters on a Youtube Show called Apollonian Transmission (also has a blog with same name). He can be hard to follow at times, and I need to thoroughly read his work, but I find his ideas interesting. At one point the sub-header on his blog said something like "Jupiter will overcome Saturn." I pray he is right. theapolloniantransmission.com/ White Spirituality is just starting to bud. I will end this by saying that priests should never run a society. They should be balanced with the security/law givers and the economic producers. Priests-Educators. Warriors-Aristocrats. Entrepreneurs-Workers. Those who make money can make as much as they like and will not be over taxed and over regulated, but the the Great White Intergalactic Art Project will come first. The Kingdom of White Heavenly Asgard comes before profits; but is totally conscious to the fact that incentives in the form of profit are what motivate most people and and likely necessary for the on-going creation of the Kingdom of White Asgard.
|
|
xio
Junior Member
Posts: 97
|
Post by xio on Apr 20, 2019 20:58:09 GMT
Easter is upon us. Whether Christ even lived is immaterial to the fact that his story is more influential than any other story in the world. In the West, His images, symbols, rites, and scriptures have been the center of our moral narrative structures for anywhere from 800 (Baltic Lands) to 1900 years (Mediterranean). Our barbarian-pagan ancestors that couldn't conform to Christian Law got hanged. We evolved with, in, and through these stories. Maybe the Romans wrote the Gospels as Joseph Atwill suggests? Perhaps the Pharisees created the religion to whip up the lower classes against the Roman Empire, after the Romans smashed the Temple? Perhaps the story was partially written on a man that displayed the qualities attributed to Christ in the gospels, and which stood up to the power structure (using speech) to the point where they had to kill him? However it started, I would say that Christ has become a symbol of self-sacrifice for something greater than self (the greater Good?). He's the 'Prince of Peace.' He's the 'Good Shepard.' Perhaps we can think of the Trinity as God the Father = The Good Christ His Son; the Logos = The dialog about the Good and how to reach the Good. The Holy Spirit = The positive affect of living a life dedicated to the good. When you live in a 'Goodly" way, you are rewarded by the miracles of the Holy Spirit. or God the Father: God of Law and Order God the Son: God of Love and Acceptance God the Spirit: properly balance Law and Love. or The Father = the field of all possible observations The Son = The observer The Holy Sprint = the common surface between observer and observed or Meaning = The Father Matter = The Mother Outcome/Issue = The Child or Passive + Active = generative or Knower That which is Know (order) That which is Unknown (chaos) Or Emotions Reason Balance between the two. The Trinity is one of the things that makes Christianity more interesting metaphysically compared to Islam or Judaism. A more esoteric interpretation of Christ's dying and rising is the idea of doing away with that which holds us back (perhaps ego death???) within ourselves, to become something better. Here's a great talk by Jordan Peterson explaining this. www.jordanbpeterson.com/transcripts/death-and-resurrection/I recall Eckhart Tolle saying he saw the Crucifix as a gruesome but divine symbol of acceptance. I think this is good insight. Christ was victorious, but in a passive way. He fought by talking and he spoke until the religious authorities didn't know what do with Him but aggressively lobby to have Him executed. He was the passive hero son as compared to the active hero sons like Thor or Beowulf. Sometimes turning the other cheek is what's called for. Sometimes you need Beowulf to cut off the arm of he who struck you and smack them on the snout with it. Is Christianity by itself too passive to defend the peoples of West? Right now it looks so, considering the behavior of the major denominations. But I wouldn't count Christianity out (if it is the faith of "Logos" after all). I think the Catholic Church is the most likely to turn itself around. No organization has survived longer. I could foresee the African Cardinal Robert Sarah becoming Pope, after Francis. Sarah has been critical of mass migration into Europe and might be ideal to address the question of nationhood. If it can't turn itself around, then new religions will replace it. But like all new religions, they will be made up partially with the old. Have a blessed Easter 2019. [1] www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhTFkUpB8zc------- 10-31-19: Observations from the Gospel regarding Christ.I'm still working this out, but from doing a lot of Lexio Divia on th Gsopels, reading of E Michael Jones' work; along with help from Vox Day's coining of the term "Gamma Male," I discovered a huge insight in the personality of Jesus of Nazareth It became clear to me, after learning about the concept of the gamma male, that the Gospels were about a gamma male that goes off. Vox Day helped illuminate me. Christ was a single man in his 30's; I do not believe he was a "Lamda." He may have had a non sexual relationship with Mary Magdeline? I do not believe it was sexual. I believe Christ was "Mother wounded," and likely unable to attach to another woman because he was essentially married to his mother (psycho-sexually). I don't want to reveal more here because people might take it as being offensive and I do not intend that. I accept Christ as I see him; mother wounded. Jesus' step father's heart likely went out (hence "St Joseph's" heart aspirin)due to nagging thus making him the "widow's son." Today the Freemasons try to make the widow's son into Hiram Abiff so that instead of destroying the temple, he helps build it.
|
|
xio
Junior Member
Posts: 97
|
Post by xio on Jun 2, 2019 17:05:59 GMT
I thought for sure I was done pontificating online for a while but two recent interviews have filled me with the spirit. The first interview was E Michael Jones (1) (actually there were 2-3 recently for Jones). Like most people on the dissident right I greatly appreciate his work on a number of subjects (Sexual liberation as social control, Forced integration, Jewish-Christian relations, art). In a sane world, Dr. Jones would be the head of the English Department at Notre Dame. With that said, I've given him a pass on his anti-whiteness in the past, as well as his disregard for border laws (I guess not much for "rendering onto Caesar?"). But lately he's been raising the intensity of his anti-whiteness and spreading his poison among the "Trads." (most of whom I like and respect). He likes to tell the story of how his ancestors were "living in mud huts and eating raw meat" before the the Church civilized them, but any rudimentary knowledge of European archaeology will show that Germans lived in timber structures (long houses in Scandinavia) and they obviously had fire as well. Correction: Jones claims he said his German ancestors were chasing pigs and worshiping trees. Not sitting in caves eating raw meat. But his point was still anti-white virtue signaling. He commented on this article which I reposted at YouTube:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PnCOfKi0GE&lc=z23tgxnh3k2lhzd5p04t1aokgmpvgdgco2nvm0d4yeisbk0h00410.1559670620781821
He made no claims of inaccuracy regarding the rest of the comment/post.
He's still pushing this ridiculous theory about the "triple melting pot." He embraces this theory with a dogmatic zeal. Maybe this theory made sense growing up when and where he did but now it certainly doesn't. If American ethnic identity is either Jewish, Catholic, or Protestant, what about people today that were never initiated into any of these faiths? When I grew up in the 80s and 90's, I never saw religious conflict between Catholics or Protestants (or Jews for that matter) once, but I did see racial conflict on several occasions. No one in school segregated by denomination. There was quite a bit of segregation by race. His thesis that forced integration during the 60's was specially targeted at Catholic Neighborhoods breaks down simply because all working class communities were targeted like this. My family were Lutherans and came up in a similar North Eastern city as Jones' Philadelphia and their old community saw the same thing happen as his. Obviously the South was by no means Catholic and we know it happened there. Dr. Jones has spoken before about "agents of influence." He has said that he has contacts high in the Vatican, so to some degree we can gauge the "non-globalist" (yet always universalist) faction's thoughts on Whiteness through him. Based on his attitudes, I'm pretty sure at this point they have every intent to force integrate the White populations of the West with the third world; thus making the Church institutionally (but not necessarily doctrinally) a cog in the anti-white machine. But like Nehemiah, I am a man of prayer. And I pray Dr. Jones and the Vatican see the folly of being anti-white. Dr. Jones said that in Detroit during the 60's that the Church should have started black parishes or even gone down South and brought Catholicism to them. Why can't the Church take this approach now, but towards whites? The Church should reject all institutional anti-whiteness within their own institutions (Colleges, charities) and outside of them (govt, industry). The Church could embrace the concept of freedom of association (which Trump will be able to push in the courts after 2020) and if whites prefer their own communities, the Church could step into these 'deracinated' communities and provide a base spiritual system. And if the Church wants to spread Benedictine Monasteries to teach the Africans (or the whole world) to work, then by all means, we will do so, and we will wait for a 1000 years to see if it really was the Benedictines that "taught the Germans to work." But we will not tolerate this 1000 year training program to occur in Europe, the US, Canada, Aus, or NZ. Of course, Dr. Jones would argue that there are no "White guys" because of Logos. You see, there are black people (he said so) , but no whites. It's all the language you speak that matters. Blacks and whites have been speaking the same language for hundreds of years in America and this relationship has been mostly unfortunate. But this is the order of the universe and EMJ said so; SO SHUT UP, because if you don't, you're nothing but "Judaizers." And "Judaizers" reject Logos, and you don't want to be like them. He is working on a book about Logos specifically. I encourage Dr. Jones to state in the book unequivocally his and the Church's stance on whiteness and freedom of association. I want him to say that whiteness is "anti-logos" and that no people of European descent (aka "White") can be allowed spaces and institutions for themselves. Luke Ford (1) said Jones had some good insights and is eccentric (he is and quite a showman) but when it came down to the facts, many of his arguments were poorly made and unsupported. I tend to agree. He doesn't talk much about his parents, but I suspect he grew up under a dominating father figure that berated and called him names. Jones likes berating and verbally abusing people and has little respect for those who advocate for white well being (while everyone basically treats him with respect). He puts major blame on everyone (especially Jo0s) for the Church's problems but puts little responsibility on the Church itself. (1) www.youtube.com/channel/UCqu-4AY-501xV5iCtt7dMKQ(2) www.youtube.com/channel/UCEYmda1KQTjrhLBeWutKuGA
|
|
xio
Junior Member
Posts: 97
|
Post by xio on Jun 2, 2019 21:54:21 GMT
The Second interview that moved me was Josh Neal's interview with Dr. Sam Vaknin (1). I hadn't noticed this interview until last week, but it occurred in February 2019. Besides Jordan Peterson, no one has taught me more about mental health online than Sam Vaknin. Vaknin has been diagnosed with both Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Anti-social Personality Disorder and has become probably the world's leading authority on NPD and personality disorders in general. He wrote a book titled Malignant Self-Love: Narcissism Revisited (2) which I recommend checking out. It was in thinking about his work that I started thinking about what group evolutionary purposes personality disorders could serve. Here's what I came up with a: Schizoid = Hermit Paranoid = Prophet/Seer Schizotypal = Mystic b: Narcissist = King Anti-social = General, executioner Borderline = Martyr Histrionic = Actor/Actress c: Codependent = Saint Dependent = Obsequious servant that can be part of an organization but must be made to pull their weight. Avoidant = ? Obsessive Compulsive = Ritualist, System creator I believe the cluster A, Anti-social PD and Obsessive Compulsive are more "right wing" PDs and that cluster C, Borderline and Histrionic are more "left wing" PDs. I leave NPD as neutral, since Vaknin claims narcissism is the root of all PDs. Avoidents behave like Schizoids but fundamentally want human connection, whereas schizoids actually prefer solitude. Obsessive Compulsive are cluster C, but right wing, in their need for order and ritual. I want to be clear, that I hope there is a day that there are no more personality disorders. But until that day comes, it's better to admit these people exist (as they must admit about themselves) , and find a role where their disorders can help build a world where there are no traumatized people. While the disordered may be able to play the role of "King" or "General", ideally you want well balanced people, whole people, to be in command. But if we have people with these special ways of experiencing the world, it's better to use them to our betterment; to create order with the disordered, truly bringing order from chaos. Personality disorders develop in people as defense from childhood trauma. Vaknin developed a PD from an extremely abusive childhood, where both of his parents would verbally and physically abuse him severely. At a young age he was found to have a 180 IQ, so he simultaneously became a source of narcissistic supply (a term coined by Vaknin) for his parents and an object of abuse for them. After he found himself in an Israeli prison (he was born is Israel) he started learning about himself and PDs. He has been able to turn his PD into an enterprise and has assisted people in escaping and healing from narcissistic abuse. He admits he doesn't do this out of empathy, but from a need to obtain narcissistic supply (and as I explained above, this is a good thing; God's handy work). Towards the End of Neal's interview with him, they started talking about race, migration, and Israel. I recall Vaknin on another podcast lamenting social media and stating that social media was mostly invented by White male psychopaths and schizoids. On Neal's podcast Vaknin showed his anti-whiteness explaining that Europe was historically seen as "retarded" and that China, the ME, and even Africa were more advanced than Europe until the 18 century. Vaknin claims that while some white nations were more technicality advanced, that others were "cave men." Vaknin gave no examples where Europeans were living in caves in the 18th or 19th centuries. Then he started talking about how in Africa every village has some advanced "consensuses building mechanism" that only made it to Europe in the 70's. He supports mass immigration into Europe and provides auguries of the future that entail unstoppable mass migration into Europe and the rise of the East as the natural state of the world. Nobody can prove if he's an Israeli asset but if you find a guy with an 180 IQ in your prison system, why wouldn't bring him into your employ? There's not that many Jews in the world. He might have gave it away in an article where he describes one day when he asked his wife if "people thought he was spy?" She said "no" and this (he reported) made him feel down. Was this his own omnipotence and grandiosity recklessly admitting to being an asset for someone? He's well read in Freud; does he support leading the "colored" races against the White man as Freud suggested his folk would do? ******It appears I'm not the only one thinking about personality disorders and E Michael Jones. I just was checking out a podcast with Richard Spencer and Edward Dutton (a great duo for a podcast) from a week ago while taking a break from writing this. Mr. Spencer even talked about the possible evolutionary reasons for personality disorders. I swear to you all by all that is Holy that I wrote to this point with no knowledge of their discussion. This happens sometimes, and I take it as a sort of White group-mind or "Egregore Albums" or "Weissgruppenverstand".
www.youtube.com/watch?v=951xl2fleiU
While I'm digressing, I'll also post this interview with Milo and Jordan Peterson. Milo discusses the role that "marginal people" (in his case h0mos) might play evolutionarily. It fits with this post and the whole thread.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHpvI8oGsuQ
I will now return to Mr. Vaknin. I hope he is not offended that for that digression? Whether Vaknin is an agent of some power can not be proven. However, in a recent interview with Life Coach Richard Grannon (I think it's this one (3)) , he invited Grannon to be part of the "Jewish Folk." He was joking, but it does show some acknowledgment of a Jewish identity. In the interview with Josh Neil he defends Israel as an ethno state. I think the idea of "God's Chosen People" would definitely appeal to Vaknin. He's also not too favorable towards Christ; he has a video called "Jesus Christ Malignant Narcissist" (4). So I will go ahead and hand an olive branch to Vaknin and offer him an open invitation to side with the Whites. If he sides with us, I will advocate for him to be a "King Herod" once White Law is established globally. He could literally be "King of the Jews" if a regime change is required in Israel. He may scoff at this, and continue to maintain the frame that the West and White humans are done for, but I think he should use his big brain and think for a while why he might be wrong. He should think more about the White man's technology and organizational ability. It is with this technology, that beyond just being "King of the Jews," I propose The Great Vaknin's brain be removed from his body, kept alive and used as an adviser (like in a box of sorts). Mr. Vaknin has said that since he is a cerebral (as apposed to a somatic) narcissist, that he sees the body as a hindrance. In the Norse mythology Odin carried the head of the giant Mimir and took council with it. If Vaknin needs to abuse and berate people from the box, this can easily be arranged. Think on it Great Vaknin. Your greatness must live on. The path towards omniscience, omnipotence, and omnipresence will be found in Mimir. Be Mimir Thrice Great Vaknin. (1) www.youtube.com/watch?v=G48qHenpKM8 (2) www.amazon.com/Malignant-Self-Love-Narcissism-Sam-Vaknin/dp/8023833847(3) www.youtube.com/watch?v=lv0qJ4UlcHE(4) www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AoJd3bWjwg
|
|
xio
Junior Member
Posts: 97
|
Post by xio on Jun 9, 2019 14:05:27 GMT
Thoughts on married Priests and Aarvoll. I wanted to make another clarification regarding the Priest class. I don't want to give the impression that only single people should be priests or spiritual figures in the future white religion. I fully support the married pursuing religious vocations as well. Take the humble Mr. Arrvoll (he's actually how I found this forum). I was watching his recent interview (1) with Josh Neal (and I agree with Mr Neal; Arrvoll is in fact "clustered with some of the more interesting people online" ). Arrvoll is very interested in philosophical and religious topics and has even taken it upon himself to work on creating a future philosophical-religious system. I admire people that would take on such a task. I also respect that he has a growing family and reports to work 50 hours a week. He plays Mozart (how about some Bach?) and by the look of his house, demands cleanliness and order in his living space. Based on the walks he takes during some of his talks, he appears to live in pleasant rural area. One of the best insights Aarvoll ever provided was the idea of Whiteness as a "technology." This technology was invented in America and he expected it to spread back to Europe. Although he might backtrack on this insight now (due to his "moral-aesthetic approach") , it was said and I am glad I heard it. Now on to married Priests and Priestesses. In the old Germanic religion, sometimes a family would own and operate a shrine or temple. The vocation is past down from generation to generation like other trades. Daily activities would be similar to the current Christian clergy; daily rites, administrative tasks, visiting people, counseling, spiritual adviser. My emphases on this thread on a religious order of single weirdos is that it would be a good place to cultivate and channel the gifts of the disordered into something that their "weirdness" can flourish within and be utilized for for the greater good, but also kept under control. As we've learned from the Catholic example, too many disordered people running your Symbolic Organizing Principle Dissemination Apparatus can lead to some negative results. With that said, we're only just starting to realize the White religion. I will now start a thread for brainstorming this religion. deepright.boards.net/thread/93/white-religion (1) www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO8DZtxYQgs
|
|
xio
Junior Member
Posts: 97
|
Post by xio on Jun 17, 2019 2:00:46 GMT
If you don't breed, it's your duty to bleed.
If you don't make kids, break a few ribs.
If you create no kin, take a punch to the chin. -------
|
|
xio
Junior Member
Posts: 97
|
Post by xio on Jul 17, 2019 0:58:00 GMT
I was listening to the McSpencer group (1). They were discussing the Bagel shop short man.There was a discussion over if people like Bagel man could be of value to the dissident right. The overwhelming consensus was that they are not. I believe under the right circumstance, in the right roles, that single men that can't or don't want to be with a woman and family can be very valuable. If you read the history of Christianity, and the Catholic Church specifically, you'll see this is undeniable. The thing you have to make law, is that the weirdos (so to speak) only support the healthy order; they don't get to shape the moral order to meet their particular particularity. So just as the "gay mafia" are pushing gay marriage in the RCC, the future "incel mafia" in the White religious order won't be allowed to push for "mandatory breeding partners assigned to every man that can't get one." I agree with Richard Spencer that we shouldn't feel bad that Bagel Shop short man can't propagate his genes; but the desire to propagate genes are so strong, that the people who can't, can have this energy channeled into a direction that provides them with the next best thing. I believe Spencer spoke to Dr. Dutton (2) about something like this. I would also post an article by Andy Nowiki (3) titled "IN DEFENSE OF BACHELORS, VIRGINS, AND AUTISTS." But I wish to repeat that the weirdos should only support the greater order. The order of crazy aunts and uncles support the normal breeding populations. You want men and women with healthy (hopefully large) families to be in command of the society. And if these people have their own Apollonian eugenic cults, then I say "Salute." (1) www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSgNEk53UWE(2) www.youtube.com/channel/UCMRs0Ml8RF0cWVAOeQeBxTw(3) affirmativeright.blogspot.com/2017/05/in-defense-of-bachelors-virgins-and.html(4) deepright.boards.net/thread/94/write-observations-field
|
|
xio
Junior Member
Posts: 97
|
Post by xio on Jul 27, 2019 21:12:08 GMT
The good Dr. Dutton teaches us about Witches (1). Explains they are more likely to engage in maladaptive behavior. I envision witches being part of the religious order, but put under a system of discipline so their skills can be channeled to good effect. At one point I included a breeding program as part of the religious order, but it was the work of the good Dr. Dutton that made me rethink this. If this order is made up of the disordered, then we don't want to propagate their genes.If these people can't find love and sex naturally, it would be extremely unwise to include a breeding program that offers them reproductive opportunities. The trade off for not having the responsibility of family is celibacy. This is the rule in religious orders from the East to the West. The power thought possible with a celibate life is discussed by White Church Father Fredrick Nietzsche in his 1880-81 notes (2) The White religious order will attempt to cultivate this power; the power of reabsorbed semen may be the fuel needed to reach the stars!!! (1) www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCnddP5bWrM (2) www.reddit.com/r/NoFap/comments/7g85yv/nietzsche_on_semen_retention/
|
|
xio
Junior Member
Posts: 97
|
Post by xio on Aug 2, 2019 1:34:34 GMT
The time of Hermits.
If you read the history of Christian monasticism, you find that it wasn't until 500s when organized monasticism really took hold. Hundreds of years earlier (late 200's) was the time of the Dessert Fathers (and Mothers).
This is really still where we are regarding White Religious orders. Hermits, but Hermits with High Speed Internet.
Instead of 300 years, I give it 30 years before the Order is real.
|
|